Raga Gets Discordant Over NaMo’s Four Year Long Saga

As the five year term of Modi government draws to a close in 2019 which is preceded by crucial assembly elections in three BJP held states of Chattisgarh, Madhya  Pradesh and Rajasthan, the relative calm that prevailed in the initial years of his regime has been replaced by palpable disquiet with string of contentious issues coming to fore lately, undermining the governments closely guarded clean image and busting the myth that country’s state  of affairs is hunky-dory.

The dalliance over Rafael deal in a bid a to keep the cards close to the chest so that the smoke screen doesn’t dissipate giving a glimpse of the real intent in adopting circuitous ways in finalizing the contract, has dragged the government before an apex court for an inquisition against charges by the opposition party of an alleged scam. Now that Supreme Court is ceased of the matter, having received the pricing information in sealed cover along with requisite details pertaining to procedural norms complied with leading up to signing the agreement and has reserved judgement, the sequence of events that ensued in the acquisition of these fighter jets still remain cryptic, pointing towards crony capitalism.

The fact that Reliance Defence Limited was registered 12 days (March 28, 2015) prior to announcement of New Rafael deal by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on April 10, 2015 gives an inkling about male fide designs in propping this company with no expertise in Defence manufacturing which eventually ends up being one of the chosen offset partners by Dassault. Interestingly, the government proceeded to cancel the original tender for purchase of 126 Medium Multi Role Combat Aircraft only on June 24, 2015. Thereafter, a memorandum of understanding on the purchase of Rafael jets was signed on January 26, 2016 when French President François Hollande visited India on the occasion of Republic Day and the deal for 36 Rafael jets for Euro 7.87 billion (approximately Rs 59,000 crores) was finally sealed on 23 September 2016. Subsequently, Anil Ambani’s RDL and Dassault Aviation announced a joint venture (Dassault Reliance Aerospace Ltd) in February 2017. Under the contract, Dassault was mandated to make compensation investments (offsets) in India worth 50% of the value of purchase. Another intriguing aspect is the amendment to offset guidelines made by Ministry of Defence in August 2015 that allowed the foreign vendor to give details of its offset partner at a date later than contract signing date, and this was being used a veil by Defence  Minister to feign ignorance about offset partners in the Rafael deal. But this excuse fell through as  “the Air Force headquarters confirmed in response to an RTI by Caravan that the inter-governmental deal and the offset contract between Dassault and the government of India were both signed on the same day — 23 September 2016” as per Caravan magazine’s cover story on the Rafael deal (September 2018).

The most recent transactional disclosure that Dassault Aviation had invested roughly 40 million Euros in Reliance Airport Developers Ltd resulting in Rs 284 Crore profit to the firm casts a shadow of serious financial impropriety and implicates Modi Government further in this murky deal. Another trivia being, this company is not the same one that Dassault had formed a joint venture with. Going back in time to gain a better perspective, Maharashtra Government in an Auction had leased 603 hectares of land for 70 years valued at Rs 63 crore to Reliance Airport Developers Ltd being highest bidders for development of five local Airports in 2009. For lack of progress in this project during next six years, the BJP led Government in Maharashtra in 2015 decided to take the assets back. Astonishingly, upon receipt of application for land allotment in July 2015, the same agency (Maharashtra Airport Development Council) allotted another parcel of land (289 acres allotted by Government, but the company took only 104 acres) at Special Economic Zone in Mihan, Nagpur in August 2015 to another group company of Anil Ambani named Reliance Aerostructre Ltd which is a partner with Dassault in the Joint Venture. Reliance Airport Developers Ltd had reported losses for financial year 2016 and 2017 and despite being in red, its parent company Reliance Infrastructure then sold its shares at a huge premium to Dassault. The rationale behind picking up 34.7% equity participation in a non-operational company defies all logic. The timeline in Rafael deal and inexplicable reason for Dassault to team up with Reliance Defence is reminiscent of a ploy that team Modi has bungled to make incontrovertible.

The subterfuge deployed by the current dispensation does not stay put with Rafael deal and has pervaded the revered democratic institutions, hampering the credibility of pillars of democracy. This was witnessed in an unprecedented move by four senior judges of the Supreme Court who in an uprising against Chief Justice Dipak Misra held a press conference to express their anguish about the problems afflicting the country’ highest court. Allocation of cases having sweeping consequences by the CJI, being a master of roster, to selective benches of preference led to mistrust between the CJI and other four senior-most judges. They pointed to the assignment of CBI judge Loya’s mysterious death case (who was hearing the sensitive Sohrabuddin Sheikh encounter case) to a three-judge bench led by CJI Dipak Misra himself. The chief justice was alleged to be clearly working under the government’s pressure.

On the other hand, the premier investigating agency (CBI) is under a cloud for the long-running feud between the Central Bureau of Investigation top boss Alok Verma and Rakesh Asthana, the special director. Alok Verma has accused Rakesh Asthana of accepting bribes and Asthana on his part had accused Verma of political favouritism and impeding the functioning of officers who are investigating corruption. The Central Bureau of Investigation had raided its own office in Delhi and the Centre stepped in to put the two warring officers on leave and appointed M Nageshwar Rao the interim director. This episode has raised serious questions about the integrity of CBI and could have damning diplomatic ramifications at a time when India is pressing for extradition of Vijay Mallaya, Norav Modi and Mehul Choksi.

Another disconcerting aspect of this regime that has kept the minorities on tenterhooks is an attempt to create a cultural divide by trying to promulgate the idea of Hindu Rashtra. Ever since the BJP took over power in 2014, there were a series of desecration of churches and attacks on Christian missionaries on the pretext of forced religious conversions to the effect that anti-conversion laws in the BJP ruled states have been enforced to target Christians which is against the very tenets of Indian constitution. Not to forget the very horrendous phenomena of lynching of Muslims by Hindutva forces, be it Mohammad Akhlaq-lynched for possessing cooked meat, Pehlu Khan or Rakbar Khan killed in Rajasthan, that passes under the guise of cow vigilantism, has led to a very toxic social environment in the country. Evidently, it is difficult to envisage such incidents without the support and protection from local politicians and the state.

As I write this piece, the Congress party has sprung a surprise with a mini resurgence of sorts by forming a Government in three states of Hindi Heartland. Will this victory translate into increasing a sizeable number of Lok Sabha seats for the party is the big question, as political analysts credit anti-incumbency, farmers distress and economic hardships faced by masses owing to demonetization and ill timed implementation of GST, for Congress’ triumph. Despite the jolt in assembly elections, the BJP is feeling buoyant about its prospects in 2019 as it is going to be direct face off between Modi and Rahul Gandhi much like in a presidential democracy where Modi’s popularity though on a marginal decline is still significantly high to catapult him to another five year term as Prime Minister.

The recent pronouncement by Supreme Court on the most harangued Rafael issue that opposition piled on Modi, stating there is no further investigation required in the matter and citing jurisdictional limitations over pricing of Rafael deal, has given a fresh lease of life to BJP. Extradition of Christian Michel in an attempt to implicate congress in Augusta Westland kickbacks and impending success in bringing back Mehul Choki and Vijay Mallya would give Modi enough arsenal to further mount a vociferous attack on Rahul Gandhi.

But it would be a fallacy to assume that Supreme Court judgement on Rafael with factual inaccuracies and no pertinent answers to the petitioner’s questions on procedural lapses (done post facto), pricing issue, selection of offset partners will deter the opposition from demanding a joint parliamentary committee probe to dig up the truth. BJP must take a cue from their recent reversals in MP, Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh that criticism of Rahul Gandhi, lack of transparency (in Rafael deal) and polarizing the electorate does not always cover up mediocre track record of governance and yield political dividends.

A Knotty Affair : Election 2014

The prospect of witnessing a fiercely fought general election in 2014 between two largest political outfits with Modi and Rahul at their respective helms, had been considerably dampened with the drubbing of congress in the recently concluded assembly elections held across four states. The reluctance of congress in apportioning the blame of defeat to its would be knight had many pundits seething in exasperation and suggesting that revival of party fortune could come about only if Rahul takes a backseat and the likes of Scindia and Pilot are thrust ahead as campaign managers. Atleast, this way one would know where the accountability lies. Humbly accepting the verdict, Rahul again threw the hat in the ring by announcing an impending restructuring in the party, stressed on establishing a connect with masses the Kejriwal way and promised unimaginable slew of measures to put his party back in reckoning. No matter how incredulous this may sound, the palpable exuberance of the nation to ascertain who shall triumph when these two political honchos lock horns, has once again rekindled. This has been stoked by reports that Congress could probably anoint Rahul as Prime Ministerial candidate in the AICC meet scheduled on 17 January, 2014.
Dubbed as having a finger on the pulse of masses through his sojourns across the length and breadth of rural India, knowing their problems like the back of his hand and heir apparent to self proclaimed pro-poor party, Rahul has repeated failed to win over their allegiance especially after 2009 despite rolling out flagship programs like MGNREGS, Food security bill etc. The most predictable reason offered for poll debacles in U.P. and other states is attributed to lack of organizational structure and need to build up strong cadres. Well, If Rahul being the chairperson of Youth congress for several years could not fill up the structural vacuum and mobilize his cadres in such long span, the party overhaul he wishes to implement just four months prior to election 2014 certainly seems a tall task and not without further widening of fissures between young blood and old vanguards.
Unfortunately, congress has lost ground in few southern pockets that once were its strongholds for taking a call on contentious issues. Andhra pradesh, which for years had been a congress bastion would prove very difficult to redeem owing to bifurcation of the state and emergence of rival faction YSR congress which enjoys immense sway in the coastal region of Andhra and expected to leave congress way behind in electoral fray. On other hand, in Tamilnadu, DMK has decided not to get into a pre-poll alliance with Congress after facing rather tumultuous experience at their hands in 2G scam with Raja and Kanimozhi landing behind bars. Others who walked away from the coalition include TMC and MIM, further reducing the choice for congress in scouting partners for support and with anti-incumbency being a huge factor this time around, a comprehensive rout seems imminent.
While the expediency and volte-face in approach adopted by initiating dialogue with Anna or requesting different party’s for extending support in passing Lokpal bill is appreciable, the skeptics see it as too little too late. Rahul certainly is attempting an image makeover by voicing opinion notably on supreme court ruling on Gay rights, trashing ordinance for protecting convicted MPs and MLAs from disqualification etc. But, the critics never for a moment cease to forget his disposition of maintaining stoic silence on issues of national/international importance, reticence to media interactions and not giving an insight into his mind . Though he could still cover his tracks gradually in coming months, the most discomfiting and loaded baggage of corruption that UPA-2 is leaving behind wouldn’t be easy to shrug off from public memory. The long list of scams(2G, Commonwealth, Coal Gate, Aadarsh etc) resulting in huge loses to state’s exchequer, are so deeply entrenched that nation seems in all likelihood made up its mind to bequeth power to BJP.
This assumption would be too far fetched since their road to forming a government is not sans glitches either. Securing an absolute majority without a strong presence in southern states and hindi heartland of U.P. which sends largest number of MP’s to parliament is virtually impossible. Stiching post poll alliances for BJP shall be a litmus test as they stand alienated by Nitish’s JDU to whom rally around a polarizing figure and PM nominee like Modi is now untenable. Other regional forces harping on secular credentials wouldn’t associate with right wing plank having a seemingly divisive agenda. Barring AIADMK and TDP, there is no inkling of a slant towards BJP from other formations. Thus, cobbling up requisite numbers to stake claim will be an uphill task unless the Messiah of development and torch bearer of progress for middle classes, manages 180 plus seats on his own steam. Attempt to realign with Yadurrapa’s party who was made to quit on charges of corruption, an issue they have been Chastising Congress for, smacks of dual standards on principles that they themselves find hard to hold onto.
The growth and development story of Gujrat certainly is Modi’s crowning glory, but the hyperbole surrounding it has repeatedly been dismissed as Gujrat was always a flourishing state even under the congress regime. The soaring popularity on social media among the youth, yet another aspect that he gloats about was also busted by the Cobra Post sting exposing Tech companies managing Modi’s campaign in exchange for money by creating false identities. The halo around Modi factor hasn’t had any profound impact on BJP’s performance in Delhi as AAP managed to garner the vote share of congress and formed the government despite being second largest party. Major credit for their stupendous run in Chattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan was ascribed to good governance by incumbent Chief Ministers and anti-establishment vote respectively.
Though Modi has been relentless in addressing rallies to make the campaign more aggressive, many opine that he has reached the crescendo pretty early. Does one know Modi’s vision for India? Political, economic and social agenda of BJP should form the crux of his discourse and swing the public opinion in their favour, rather than scornful personal barbs. What is most disgraceful is the crass tone he employs in criticizing the opposition and some of its prominent leaders in his nasal twang. Certainly, his demeanour lacks the persona that dignified and graceful Leaders are made of.
The ensuing general elections 2014 would baffle the nation in choosing between Rahul – Inexperienced, idealistic enigma who has shunned responsibility all through and owes his candidature for the top job to family legacy and Modi – an authoritarian leader with third tenure under his belt as Chief minister of Gujrat, carrying a blemish of Godhra riots which he cannot wish away and regarded as panacea of all problems facing the country by some sections of society. Neither of them fit the bill for premiership. A fractured mandate with BJP emerging as the single largest party is a distinct possibility. As one congressman put it, Congress could well take their badly bruised image and despicable performance in assembly elections as an opportunity to introspect, revamp their party and rise like a phoenix whenever subsequent opportunity (beyond 2014) presents itself. Perhaps, it is their turn to play constructive opposition and scoff at every instance BJP falters, with a wry smile.

Strong Ethics Alone Can Stem the Political Rot

Scrupulous conscience that refuses to buckle in any circumstances is paramount to a person’s character while traversing a path connected with public life. Sadly, the current state of affairs, reflect a total paradox and erosion of moral values has become a deep rooted menace to eradicate. Across the spectrum, political groups are fraught with individuals who jump onto the bandwagon of politics either clamoring for power or with covert intent of making it a lucrative career option. These misplaced ideals have overshadowed the true essence of being an elected representative which places upon them a mandate of discharging selfless service aligned to aspirations of their constituencies and thereby steering the party agenda ahead. India’s model of multi-party democracy has thrown up numerous factions over the years, mostly having regional identity and few mainstream groups with a pan India presence. Thus, convergence of diverse ideologies in an era of coalition politics is another challenge that has ruffled many a regime.

Ideally, parties with similar leanings and common minimum program that come together to form a power equation should scrape by. But, discord and disagreement over major policy issues between ruling party and their coalition partners keeps government on tenterhooks with a perpetual fear of losing majority. This is a fall out of striking balance to stay afloat both in their regional backyard by pandering to the vote bank and at the centre, though at the expense of country’s detriment. Recent example of this trend in UPA’s second term is Trinamool Congress, having opposed crucial initiatives like FDI in retail, Pension reforms, Lokpal bill etc on domestic front and curtailed the signing of Teesta water treaty with Bangladesh. The Leftist (CPI) too played truant when it came to passage of nuclear bill and withdrew support during the first term.

Apart from anguish of keeping the coalition intact, there is a bigger albatross around the neck to contend with, the principle opposition. Their task, instead of playing constructive role has acquired new dimension of adopting any skewed approach to usurp power. Acting in cahoots with groups having diametrically opposite ideology to scuttle passage of bills, scouting for sticky issues to put the government on the mat, demanding resignation of key cabinet ministers who dig into nefarious designs of their cadres, withholding party views and indulging in double speak on important issues has become the prescribed code of conduct.

Yearning to be back in power is perfectly legitimate but the means of getting there should not be spurious. Shrill pitched anti-government rhetoric can well be replaced by demonstrable good governance in opposition rules states, progress card of development reforms could be brandished, welfare schemes that benefited masses be highlighted among a plethora of issues, to stake a credible claim to power. But to nation’s dismay, elections have become synonymous with slugfest, appeasement of minorities by spiking up reservation percentages to garner votes, playing up communal card over disputed sites and what have you.

There are host of burning issues that need redressing on priority, like improving literacy rate, reduction in prevalence of malnutrition among children where India stands among the highest in the world, alleviation of poverty etc. Fragile ethics and obsession with power politics has culminated in unprecedented corruption. Big ticket swindling in 2G and Commonwealth games, has mired the decision making process at the bureaucratic level owing to fear of being hauled up for even a miniscule act of omission. This upheaval that India has plunged itself in, has pushed real issues into oblivion. It just doesn’t suffice to be counted among most sought after emerging economies and sustaining growth rate of 7-8% in a period of economic gloom the world over.

Progressive vision that embraces social, economic, law and order issues should encapsulate the agenda of any political outfit which in turn lends to well being and welfare of entire nation rather than a particular section of society. That’s the fundamental purpose of politics from layman’s point of view, though it is a relative thought and might have numerous others connotations in present times. The prerequisite to replicate this definition in practice requires quelling the narrow political considerations, looking beyond fulfilling personal agendas through corrupt practices and cleansing of conscience.

The Indian polity has to do some serious soul searching. Unless it realizes social and moral responsibility and reinvigorates itself with a genuine desire to serve its citizens, the fabric of largest democracy runs the risk of being reduced to tatters in the coming years.

A Garland Worth Crores

Political debates on News channels are about vociferously defending a party’s stand point and taking pot shots at opponents. More often than not, they turn hostile with panelists trying to rebut each other simultaneously thus making the discussion a cacophonous outburst. The anchors being moderators too, have a tough time doing the balancing act in giving an equal participating opportunity to all speakers within restricted time span. Having to contend with influential, high ranking and eminent panel with bloated egos on the show makes it even more delicately poised. Probably, providence has a way of putting these anchors at ease once in a while by turning discussions hilarious. The recent DIG level investigation ordered by Mayawati to probe the alleged conspiracy hatched by congress, of letting loose a swarm of bees to attack her while addressing a BSP rally, was a complete laugh riot.

The subject itself was ludicrous and the guests left no stone unturned in making snide remarks at “Queen Bee”. Imagine the plight of DIG who had earlier investigated some high profile cases, was now being asked to probe the bee attack as if he would swoop down on them and shift the entire hive inside the prison cell. On a serious note, the officer is in a tangle to either frame some scapegoat as part of his investigation to pacify the chief minister or lose his job. That too, the culpability of igniting fire to make bees go berserk should lie with congress as they were most vehement in condemning the ostentatious display of wealth. It cannot get any more bizarre than this.

But there were those who put their astute brains to use in ascertaining the worth of the garland by diligent mathematical calculations. The estimates vacillated from several lakhs to twenty two crores. The television viewers though were spared the agony of having to bear with statisticians computing mean and variance of cash entwined in ten meter long garland. In hindsight, it would not be presumptuous to assume that bees had swapped their loyalty and were clamouring for wreath of currency notes around CM’s neck instead of Honey (Mayawati) itself.

Procrastination : A Remedy For All Problems

The ruckus over Tharoor’s “Interlocutor” remark has hit headlines again. The minister has irked and embarrassed his party with such relentless regularity that expecting him to remain politically correct is a fallacy. But interestingly all the controversy his statements have raked up is centered around usage of dialect and it has now reached a crescendo when he sought to point out the difference between “Mediator” and “Interlocutor” in his defense. Interpreting his sound bytes and twitter messages has gotten critics to dig deep into intricacies of English language and the media is feeling insulted at the hint that his language is not being understood. So, here’s a minister who seemingly reminds us of his sound literary grounding time and again, having authored several books. This is a contrast of sorts, since majority of Indian politicians are incoherent while articulating their views.

In all fairness, overturning the foreign policy decision, of having no third party intervention in addressing issues concerning Pakistan and dealing with them only in the bilateral realm, is a gross violation. India asking Saudi Arabia to exert their influence on Pakistan to stop cross border terrorism could be termed as going an extra mile in ironing out problems with its neighbour. On the other hand, the slightest overture of involving a third country to intervene and mediate even through inappropriate usage of spoken word can spell trouble. Ironically, foreign policy issues are being deciphered on the basis of semantics. Despite several slip ups and receiving flak from opposition for his comments, congress just decides to bury the hatchet by expressing displeasure over the matter. Isn’t it time to clip the wings of partymen who rake up a controversy at the drop of a hat and show them the door?

The party’s attitude of dragging its feet is just not restricted to Tharoor’s conduct but applies to matters as grave as terrorism emanating from across the border. A case in point would be the wavering stance adopted over JUD’s war cry against India. They decided to go ahead with foreign secretary level talks with Pakistan on the premise that some progress on terror has taken place and no engagement whatsoever would further hinder the peace agenda. When the bugle of jihad blew over the streets of Lahore in the form of a huge rally, the external affairs ministry chose to give it a deaf ear stating that rhetoric by likes of Hafiz Saeed should not be given much importance. But, why is India then insisting on his captivity and holds him as prime conspirator of 26/11 when his speeches are to be brushed aside. Then, leading up to the talks, Pune witnessed a terror strike which was being seen as preceded by specific warning by JUD’s top brass. Subsequent to the German bakery attack, there was again an echo that India should not fall prey to attempts by vested interests aimed at derailing the ensuing dialogue.

As expected, the talks were reduced to mere farce with Pakistani delegation making strong statements and referring to Indian dossiers as piece of literature rather than treating those as proof of their complicity. Both countries addressing press conferences separately resulted in contradictory details emerging with respect to primary focus of discussion. The neighbour claiming Kashmir was touched upon in great detail while the Indian contingent downplayed the same and stressed on having made demands for dismantling terror infrastructure and clamping down on overt acts of perpetrating violence. In the backdrop of events that played out in last year and a half, Congress must have realized the fact that dialogue and diplomacy with Pakistan would not budge them an inch. Yet, congress seems content in pursuing the same approach.

Will the menace of terrorism and troubled ties with Pakistan, ever be handled by congress regime in a manner that befits the neighbour’s shirking and obstinate ways. Perhaps, procrastination has become congress’ forte and recourse to tackling problems instead of being resolute in its stand.

Sena’s Tirade Bites Dust

It takes bollywood stars steadfastness against Sena’s tirade to exercise the constitutional right to freedom of expression in Maratha land. That reeks of surreal democracy, the populace of this country so proudly embraces and more agonizing is ruling regimes frailty in upholding its tenets. Such is the spineless disposition of the state government that it only assures to provide cover against any disruption the Shivsainiks has vowed to unleash instead of nipping the violent steak and instincts of hooliganism in the bud that characterize them. Despite having a lot at stake commercially, Shahrukh has refrained from reaching out to Bal Thackeray or retracting his statement on non-inclusion of players from Pakistan in IPL-3 by tendering an apology. Qudos to his spirit as this precedent has garnered a lot of support in his favour from various quarters. These voices would otherwise have remained stifled, searching for a denizen who could be audacious enough to defy the wrath of lumpen elements, to echo their sentiments.

The leadership of a regional party so easily claiming propriety to an entire state on frivolous grounds of their regional identity and acting like self appointed guardians of Marathi Manoos, needs to be scoffed at. This delusion, when their outfit couldn’t even manage to secure the mandate of its people is even more bizarre and anti-national. Shouldn’t this ideology which is unconstitutional and totally converse to the principles of democracy, automatically expunge them from being part of electoral politics?

A viewpoint that Pakistan cricketers shouldn’t have been isolated from IPL-3 by franchise owners, does not make the person expressing it partisan and construed as owing allegiance to a neighboring country. Though, Shahrukh himself could not eventually include any Pak-player is another question. He elaborated his intent of doing so but the injury to player of his choice could not make it possible and thereby other viable option was exercised. Infact, aftermath of 26/11 has complicated issues and would have had some semblance of influence on the perspective of team owners viz the player’s availability factor, possibility of match disruption at certain venues and eventuality of terror attacks. Nevertheless, all franchises cited their own strategic compulsions in keeping away from Pak-players and made themselves oblivious to political posturing with Pakistan while deciding the team composition.

But why not pick on a political figure who also happens to be Home minister of India. Mr. Chidambaram on national television had articulated his displeasure on this issue and went to the extent of saying that IPL has done disservice to the sport by distancing itself from world class T-20 players. Perhaps, Sena thought him to be beyond their grasp to muscle round with or that their idiosyncrasy would not hold ground and picked on an easy target.. This way, they could prompt a two pronged attack, one on his religious identity and his vocation being the other which meant serious monetary ramifications not just for the actor but many other business associates if screening of his film is disrupted.

In a larger context, it is evident that Shiv Sena having been consecutively routed in three assembly polls is getting marginalized, with MNS further cutting into their vote bank. Bereft of any genuine issue, they are harping on misplaced nationalism and targeting the film and its protagonist, to keep themselves afloat. The fact they are ignorant of is that their bankrupt political agenda and bullying ways is alienating the masses further and would not take the party long to get decimated from the political arena if they do not do away with their blinkers.

The entire Sena-SRK plot has culminated in a manner that movies are usually scripted, with “good overcoming the evil”, but this time around the country would not feel wretched of repetitive story-line like they do for reel action. Rather, this real life magnum opus would be lapped up as a triumph of innate democratic values that ”Badshah” refused to comprise on and went around proudly proclaiming ” My Name is Khan”.